Miércoles 23 Mayo 2012
Avanzado
BUSCADOR DE NOTAS AVANZADO Palabra clave: En: De: (MM/AA)A: (MM/AA)Ordenar por:

I2CREDIT Nº 30

EE.UU: Using DSO to Measure Collection Efficiency

EE.UU: Using DSO to Measure Collection EfficiencyCredit executives have an abundance of measures available to help them quantify and analyze the success of their efforts. One of the most widely used (and some credit executives might say, misused) measures is Days Sales Outstanding, or DSO.

Por: Originally published: 2/23/2005
Bookmark and Share

Days Sales Outstanding expresses the average time, in days, it takes your company to convert its accounts receivables into cash. There are several ways to calculate DSO. When used appropriately and consistently, these calculations can help you answer a variety of questions about the effectiveness of your credit and collection policies and practices. For instance, are your credit terms in line with competitors? Are your collection procedures successful in meeting stated goals? Is your customer base risky?

Before discussing the various DSO formulas, a few words about making DSO, or any performance measure meaningful. There are basically six requirements (as outlined in "Performance Measures for Credit, Collections and Accounts Receivable"):

1. The measure should express a value that complements and supports the objectives of your company and department.
2. It must be communicated to all individuals responsible for the process being measured.
3. It must be compared to some standard, for instance, past company performance, or an industry benchmark.
4. It must be used consistently, from month to month, year to year.
5. The results should elicit some action - correcting course, managing change for improvement.
6. It should provide a benefit. This could be as basic as the satisfaction of reaching a goal that contributes to the organization’s success.

Formulas for Calculating DSO:

DSO is important as a financial indicator to the extent that it shows the age, in terms of days, of an organization's accounts receivable and the average time it takes to turn those receivables into cash.
It can give insight into the changes occurring within an organization's receivable balance; indicating whether a change occurred because of a positive or negative fluctuation in sales during that period, or if other business factors such as promotional discounts, seasonality, selling terms, etc. created the effect.
Each method for calculating DSO (outlined below) has its own strengths, and each is based on what might be called the Standard DSO formula. The key to making effective use of any of these tools is consistency. Select the methods that work best for you and stick with them.
For each of the example DSO calculations that follow will use the same receivables data, listed below. The date for on which the DSO is calculated will be September 30, 2004.

Date of Invoice

Age Bucket

Dollars in Bucket

Credit Sales in Period

9/28/04

Current

$3,000

$5,000

8/28/04

1-30 days past due

$3,000

$6,000

7/28/04

31-60 days past due

$2,000

$5,000

Total Open Receivables

$8,000

$16,000

Total Open Receivables $8,000 $16,000
Sales Periods (for consistency):

• Annual = 365 days
• Six Months = 182 days
• Quarter = 91 days
• Month = actual # days in the month

Note that since the data utilized is limited and quite simple, the various DSO calculations should be close to equal.

Standard DSO Calculation

The Standard DSO calculation provides an average (aggregate) time in days it takes to convert accounts receivables into cash. It should be tracked over time and compared to previous company results or industry/competitor benchmarks.

Standard DSO Formula and calculation utilizing data above:

(Ending Total Receivables / Total Credit Sales) x Number of Days in Period

For the 3rd Q: ($8,000 / $16,000) x 91 = 45.5 days DSO

Best Possible DSO Calculation

Best Possible DSO utilizes only your current (non delinquent) receivables to calculate the best length of time you can achieve in turning over receivables. It should be compared to the standard calculation above, and be close to your terms of sale. The closer your standard DSO is to your best possible DSO, the closer your receivables are to your optimal level.

Best DSO Formula and calculation utilizing data above:

(Current Receivables / Total Credit Sales) x Number of Days

($3,000 / $16,000) x 91 = 17 days Best Possible DSO

Delinquent DSO (Average Days Delinquent) Calculation

Delinquent DSO or Average Days Delinquent (ADD) calculates the average time from the invoice due date to the paid date, that is,the average days invoices are past due. It provides a snapshot to evaluate individuals, subgroups or overall collection performance.

Delinquent DSO Formula

Standard DSO - Best Possible DSO = Average Days Delinquent

45.5 - 17 = 28.5 average days delinquent

Sales Weighted DSO Calculation

Sales Weighted DSO, as with the regular DSO calculation, measures the average time that receivables are outstanding. However, it is considered by some an improvement over other methods of calculating DSO because it attempts to smooth out the bias of credit sales and terms of sale. (See Gallinger in Resources for Further Information below).

Sales Weighted DSO Formula

{($ in Current Age Bucket / Credit Sales of Current Period) +

($ in 1-30 Day Age Bucket / Credit Sales one month prior) +

($ in 31-60 Day Age Bucket / Credit Sales two months prior) +

(etc.)} x 30

{($3,000 / $5,000) + ($3000 / $6,000) + ($2,000 / $5,000)} x 30

= (.6 + .5 + .4) x 30

= 45 days Sales Weighted DSO

Countback DSO Calculation

Another method for calculating DSO that takes into account sales fluctuations is a formula called the Countback Method. According to an article in the June 2004 issue of Credit Today newsletter, this method provides a more accurate picture of DSO and its month-to-month fluctuations in sales and past due receivables. It also gives more weight to the current month’s sales, making the correct assumption that most of the A/R balance will be from current, as opposed to previous sales. And, it takes into account the real effect of the actual difference in the number of days per month (i.e. 28 in February vs. 30 in April, June, September, November vs. 31 the rest of the months).
The Countback Method can be used with any time frame. If terms are net 30, then monthly balances are used. If terms are net 10, weekly numbers might be used. This method involves three steps.

Countback DSO Formula

Step 1. Days counted back = # of days in current month. September = 30

Step 2. Calculate DSO for periods prior to step 1

Month end net A/R balance - Current month’s sales
= Prior Periods Receivables

Ex. $8,000 - $5,000 = $3,000 prior period's receivables

Note, if the prior period’s receivables is larger than the prior month’s sales, repeat step 1. The DSO will be greater than 2 months.

Prior Period = (Prior Periods Receivables / Credit Sales for Prior Period)
x Number Days in Period (August has 31 days)

Ex. ($3,000 / $6,000) x 31 = 15.5

Step 3. Add DSO for previous period to days counted back in Step 1

Ex. 15.5 + 30 = 45.5 Countback DSO

True DSO Calculation

True DSO calculates the actual number of days credit sales are unpaid by tracking individual invoices to the month of sale.

True DSO Formula

(invoice amount / net credit sales for the month in which the sale occurred)
x number of days from invoice date to reporting date (9/30/04)

September Invoice = ($3,000 / $5,000) x 2 = 1.2 days
August Invoice = ($3,000 / $6,000) x 33 = 16.5 days
July Invoice = ($2,000 / $5,000) x 64 = 25.6 days

Sum of True DSO for all open invoices = True DSO per total accounts receivable

1.2 + 16.5 + 25.6 = 43.3 True DSO

Benchmarking DSO

In general, if your company's DSO is no more than 10-15 days longer than terms of sale, the receivables are turning into cash without much difficulty.
Benchmarking data for DSO is somewhat hard to come by, and even more difficult to find without paying a fee. The Credit Research Foundation (CRF) does a quarterly study, the National Summary of Domestic Trade Receivables (a.k.a., the DSO Survey), that is an examination of the condition of A/R for U.S. companies. The CRF has been collecting this data quarterly since 1960. The results of the complete study are available to CRF members and those participating in the survey.

A view of the Summary data for fourth quarter 2004 is available on the Credit-to-Cash-Advisor.com web site.

Outlined below is some very general DSO benchmarking information. You can get more specific and exhaustive benchmarking information by subscribing on the web site of Strategic Advantage.

SIC Code

Industry

Average DSO

# Cos.
in Sample

23xx

Apparel & Other Textile Prods

40.6

40

25xx

Furniture & Fixtures

52.2

27

26xx

Paper & Allied Products

54.6

44

27xx

Printing & Publishing

49.9

65

28xx

Chemicals & Allied Prods

59.4

277

30xx

Rubber & Misc Plastics

48.8

50

31xx

Leather & Leather Prods

55.6

17

35xx

Industrial Machiner & Equip

70.7

245

36xx

Electric & Electronic Equip

51.9

407

39xx

Misc Manufacturing

53.8

49

48xx

Communications

47.9

201

50xx

Wholesale Trade - Durable Goods

47.7

257

51xx

Wholesale Trade - Nondurable

26.9

87

73xx

Business Services

89.2

734

Resources for Further Information
Olsen, Rob "Performance Measures for Credit, Collections and Accounts Receivable." Credit Research Foundation web site.

"Why You Should Switch to the Countback Method to Calculate DSO." Credit Today newsletter: June 2004, pg. 1

Gallinger, George W. "An Evaluation of Techniques for Monitoring Accounts Receivable." Columbia: NACM, 1995.



Ultimas Notas

I2CREDIT Nº 30

Cómo comunicarnos con nuestros clientes

Cómo comunicarnos con nuestros clientesLas empresas triunfadoras se caracterizan por enfocarse en el cliente, en sus expectativas y necesidades, es por esto que el enfoque de ventas más útil y efectivo es aquel en el cual se busca compartir beneficios entre cliente y vendedor, aquel en el que no existen ganadores ni perdedores y esto se logra aplicando la comunicación efectiva.

Por: Camilo Cruz www.ganaropciones.com.ar

España: Ley 3/2004

España: Ley 3/2004Esta Ley tiene por objeto incorporar al derecho interno la Directiva 2000/35/CE, del Parlamento Europeo y del Consejo, de 29 de junio de 2000, por la que se establecen medidas de lucha contra la morosidad en las operaciones comerciales.

España: Comentarios a la ley 3/2004 de morosidad

España: Comentarios a la ley 3/2004 de morosidadComentarios a la ley 3/2004 de 29 de Diciembre por la que se establecen medidas de lucha contra la morosidad en las operaciones comerciales.

Por: Montserrat Pérez de Miguel Directora Dto. Juridico IURIS JUSTITIA CREDITORS

Argentina: El Cobrador no debe juzgar al deudor, debe cobrarle | * Exclusivo RC&C

Argentina: El Cobrador no debe juzgar al deudor, debe cobrarle | * Exclusivo RC&CHace unos días encuentro a una empleada mía sentada en su escritorio hablando sola en voz alta, sosteniendo en sus manos antecedentes de una deudora y un informe ambiental con una propuesta de pago.

Por: Eduardo Buero Gerente de Seguimiento y Control de Cartera del Banco Hipotecario S.A.

Argentina: Hacia la inoponibilidad de la franquicia de los contratos de seguros al consumidor

Argentina: Hacia la inoponibilidad de la franquicia de los contratos de seguros al consumidorEn palabras de Mosset Iturraspe y Lorenzetti “El mercado, al que concurren empresarios proveedores y consumidores, no es una ínsula, extraña a la sociedad civil, en expresión de Natalio Irti. No es un ‘campo donde se compita en habilidades o destrezas’. Es el terreno de la satisfacción de necesidades del ser humano, esa ‘cosa sagrada’, al decir de Séneca; esa ‘cosa preciosa’, en palabras de la Constitución de la Provincia de Corrientes de 1821.

Por: Nancy Noriega Abogada

Notas Destacadas

2012
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 106
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 105
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 104
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 103
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 102
2011
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 101
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 100
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 99
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 98
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 97
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 96
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 95
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 94
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 93
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 92
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 91
2010
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 90
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 89
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 88
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 87
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 86
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 85
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 84
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 83
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 82
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 81
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 80
2009
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 79
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 78
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 77
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 76
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 75
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 74
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 73
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 72
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 71
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 70
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 69
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 68
2008
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 67
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 66
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 65
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 64
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 63
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 62
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 61
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 60
2007
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 59
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 58
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 57
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 56
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 55
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 54
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 53
2006
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 52
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 51
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 50
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 49
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 48
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 47
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 46
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 45
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 44
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 43
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 42
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 41
2005
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 40
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 39
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 38
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 37
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 36
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 35
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 34
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 33
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 32
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 31
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 30
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 29
2004
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 28
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 27
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 26
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 25
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 24
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 23
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 22
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 21
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 20
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 19
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 18
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 17
2003
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 16
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 15
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 14
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 13
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 12
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 11
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 10
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 9
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 8
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 7
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 6
2002
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 5
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 4
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 3
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 2
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 1

Ultima Revista

Noviembre 2011
Julio 2011
Ediciones Anteriores Regístrese Anuncie en la revista Si desea anunciar en nuestra revista, contactese con:
Rodrigo Rotunno
rodrigo.rotunno@cmspeople.com
+ 54 (11) 4313 4000
http://www.cmseventos.com/microf_peru_2012/ http://www.cmseventos.com/argentina_2012/ http://www.cmseventos.com/venezuela_2012/ http://www.cmspeople.com/es/ http://www.cmseventos.com/es/

Consultas sobre servicios: info@cmspeople.com
® CMS | Credit Management Solutions S.A. | Todos los derechos reservados

Mapa del sitio | Contacto

Osmosis Diseño y Comunicación