Martes 22 Mayo 2012
Avanzado
BUSCADOR DE NOTAS AVANZADO Palabra clave: En: De: (MM/AA)A: (MM/AA)Ordenar por:

I2CREDIT Nº 16

Making the Right Collections Calls

Making the Right Collections CallsAction-specific modeling helps firms collect more delinquent dollars than traditional behavioral scoring.

Por: Lois Brown Credit & Collections World
Bookmark and Share
Traditional behavioral scoring has filled the bill for many years by providing a basis for making decisions about which delinquent accounts to call. But with millions of dollars in uncollected delinquent dollars, many financial institutions are supplementing their behavioral scoring approach with action-specific modeling solutions that predict the response to particular actions – such as sending a letter, making a call, and placement with an agency – on specific accounts. The most appropriate and profitable action may then be taken for each account.

The benefits of action-specific modeling include: an improved cure rate, resulting in more dollars collected along with lower roll rates and fewer chargeoffs; reduced call volume, making better use of collections call center resources; improved customer retention, by eliminating collections calls to those likely to pay without a call; and fast return on investment, with payback typically in just a few months.

In the early stages of delinquency, the percent of self-cures (those likely to pay even without a call) can be 30% to 50% or higher. By accurately identifying self-cures, action-specific modeling helps collections centers focus activity. For late stage delinquency, it can help identify accounts that will not pay unless a collections agency calls. An early decision to place these accounts externally could mean collecting while the debtor still has funds available.

Behavioral scoring uses a statistical method to predict the likelihood that an account will make a payment, reach a later stage of delinquency, or eventually chargeoff. The traditional strategy classifies delinquent accounts into high-risk, medium-risk, and low-risk categories based on the value of a behavioral score. Collections call centers focus their efforts on high-risk accounts. As a result, high-risk accounts are called, while low-risk accounts are not.

However, behavioral scoring is limited. First, it does not identify which accounts will respond to a call and which will not. Models are developed on an average set of actions without considering which actions are effective on a particular account. Second, traditional behavioral scoring uses a group-based approach. All accounts in a high-risk group are assigned a specific action, such as a phone call, while all accounts in a low-risk group are assigned another action, such as no call. The collections call center misses the opportunity to call low-risk accounts that need agent assistance to pay, while needlessly calling those who will pay without a call or those who will not pay no matter what actions are taken. These inefficiencies limit the amount that can be collected, and waste call center resources.

Action-specific modeling, on the other hand, allows collections call centers to see the whole picture by predicting the response to collections actions on each account. Both self-cures and non-cures are identified, so resources can be directed to responsive accounts.
Action-specific models are built using the creditor’s data, such as:
• Account master file: delinquency history, geography, time on file, balance
• Relationship: breadth and depth of relationship
• Collections activity: payment history, calls, promises, broken promises.

Models that predict the outcomes of certain actions are developed using an experiment to eliminate the bias in data. Each action (call vs. don’t call; low intensity calls vs. high intensity calls; settlement offer vs. agency; active skip trace effort vs. letter) is applied to a random sample of accounts, and the responses are tracked over the performance period. Since the samples are random, the models can be applied to accounts across the population.

Action-specific modeling software continually captures new and updated data. Periodic experiments and model rebuilding ensure that changes in the portfolio are captured and new predictive characteristics are included.

Through this ongoing process, collections call centers can continually test new actions and new populations to refine and enhance their strategies and resource allocations.

Lois Brown is vice president of marketing at Austin Logistics, which develops and markets analytic software applications that maximize call center effectiveness, consumer collections, and risk management. For more information, visit their website at www.austinlogistics.com.

Ultimas Notas

I2CREDIT Nº 16

¿ Cual es la diferencia ?

¿ Cual es la diferencia ?En este número del Reporter de Créditos & Cobranzas decidimos tomarnos un momento de reflexión sobre aspectos que hacen a nuestro día a día fuera del mundo de cobranzas. Este texto nos llegó por email y creímos que debíamos compartirlo con Uds. La diferencia entre los países pobres y los ricos no es la antigüedad del país. Lo demuestran casos de países como India y Egipto, que tienen miles de años de antigüedad y son pobres.

Por: Staff CMS

COBRAR MAS DEPENDE SOLO DEL COBRADOR

COBRAR MAS DEPENDE SOLO DEL COBRADOREstoy convencido del título de este artículo y les aseguro que no acabo de hacerme gárgaras con vodka....
No acepto ninguna excusa u objeción para justificar no pagar la deuda...

Por: Eduardo Buero Capacitador Asociado CMS

SE SUAVIZA LA CAÍDA DEL STOCK DE HIPOTECARIOS en ARGENTINA

SE SUAVIZA LA CAÍDA DEL STOCK DE HIPOTECARIOS en ARGENTINAEn los últimos tres meses, cinco entidades del sistema relanzaron sus líneas de préstamos hipotecarios con un moderado grado de éxito...

Por: www.notibancos.com

De cobradores disfrazados en Asturias...

De cobradores disfrazados en Asturias...En la Inglaterra victoriana a la gente se la encarcelaba por deudas, basta con leer a Dickens ­si es que alguien hoy se toma aún la molestia de visitar las páginas del autor de «Oliver Twist»­ para comprobarlo. Pero en la España de nuestros días somos bastante menos drásticos e inhumanos que los contemporáneos de Jack el Destripador...

Por: Fernando Cuesta Diario La Nueva España (Asturias)

ESTADO ACTUAL DE LA BANCA DIGITAL EN ARGENTINA

ESTADO ACTUAL DE LA BANCA DIGITAL EN ARGENTINALa óptima explotación de los canales digitales (homebanking, phonebanking y red de cajeros automáticos) contribuye de varios modos a la mejora del servicio de atención al público. En primer lugar, brinda a los clientes la posibilidad de operar las 24 horas del día sin acercarse a su sucursal bancaria, y en segundo lugar, descomprime la atención por mostrador, permitiendo que este servicio se preste de manera mas ágil y personalizada.

Por: NOTIBANCOS.COM

Notas Destacadas

2012
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 106
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 105
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 104
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 103
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 102
2011
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 101
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 100
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 99
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 98
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 97
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 96
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 95
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 94
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 93
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 92
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 91
2010
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 90
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 89
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 88
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 87
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 86
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 85
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 84
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 83
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 82
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 81
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 80
2009
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 79
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 78
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 77
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 76
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 75
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 74
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 73
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 72
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 71
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 70
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 69
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 68
2008
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 67
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 66
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 65
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 64
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 63
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 62
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 61
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 60
2007
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 59
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 58
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 57
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 56
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 55
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 54
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 53
2006
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 52
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 51
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 50
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 49
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 48
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 47
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 46
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 45
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 44
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 43
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 42
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 41
2005
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 40
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 39
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 38
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 37
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 36
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 35
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 34
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 33
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 32
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 31
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 30
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 29
2004
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 28
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 27
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 26
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 25
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 24
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 23
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 22
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 21
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 20
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 19
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 18
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 17
2003
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 16
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 15
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 14
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 13
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 12
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 11
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 10
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 9
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 8
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 7
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 6
2002
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 5
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 4
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 3
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 2
CREDIT PERFORMANCE Nº 1

Ultima Revista

Noviembre 2011
Julio 2011
Ediciones Anteriores Regístrese Anuncie en la revista Si desea anunciar en nuestra revista, contactese con:
Rodrigo Rotunno
rodrigo.rotunno@cmspeople.com
+ 54 (11) 4313 4000
http://www.cmseventos.com/microf_peru_2012/ http://www.cmseventos.com/argentina_2012/ http://www.cmseventos.com/venezuela_2012/ http://www.cmspeople.com/es/ http://www.cmseventos.com/es/

Consultas sobre servicios: info@cmspeople.com
® CMS | Credit Management Solutions S.A. | Todos los derechos reservados

Mapa del sitio | Contacto

Osmosis Diseño y Comunicación